Dynastic Legitimacy and Ruler Representation in Hellenistic Royal Metropoleis: A Comparative Study of the Seleukid and Ptolemaic „Policy of Images“

Egypt, silver tetradrachm. Head of Ptolemaios I. with diadem. Inscription on the reverse: ΠΤΟΛΕΜΑΙΟΥ ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ
Seleucian tetradrachm, silver. Obverse: Diadem head of Seleucus I with bull’s horn; reverse: Apollo with bow seating on omphalos.

Triumphant commander in the succession of Alexander the Great or symbol of decadent extravagance, ancient Egyptian deity or patron of the Jewish community – the kings and queens of the Hellenistic period (322–30 BC) appear in very different, even contradictory guises, depending on which source you look at. The spectrum of their self-portrayal and contemporary attributions is extremely broad. The monarchies that emerged from the legacy of Alexander's conquests demonstrated an astonishing flexibility in adapting very different customs and forms of representation for the purpose of establishing dynastic legitimacy. In doing so, the rulers of Greek-Macedonian origin responded to the very heterogeneous expectations of their subjects and the complex acculturation processes that took place between the Greek elites and the cultures of the Ancient Orient and Egypt.

But how exactly did the ruler's self-stylisation correspond to the imaginary worlds of the different groups of subjects? Despite intensive research into the Hellenistic kingdoms, little is still known about this. This is where the project of the ancient historians Prof. Dr Eva Anagnostou-Laoutides and Prof. Dr Stefan Pfeiffer comes in. By comprehensively comparing the depictions of kings from the two most important Hellenistic dynasties, the Seleucids and the Ptolemies, the international research group aims to find out how the individual ruler portrayals were created and through which cultural channels they were disseminated. 

Bust of Seleucus I., Museo Archeologico Nazionale, Naples
Bust of Ptolemaios I., Louvre, Paris

The focus of the investigation is on the respective capitals of the two empires: both the Seleucid residences of Seleucia on the Tigris and Antioch on the Orontes, as well as Alexandria, the metropolis of the Ptolemaic Empire, were deliberately conceived by the kings as centres of their representation and display of splendour. The population structure of the metropolises reflected the multi-ethnic composition of the kingdoms, which is why processes of "translation" of local traditions can be observed well in the capitals. The Seleucids, for example, repeatedly made reference to Babylonian mythology, but interpreted it in a way that was also comprehensible to the Greek settlers and other subject groups. At the royal court in Alexandria, Ptolemy II and his sister-wife Arsinoe II staged themselves either as the siblings Zeus and Hera or Osiris and Isis, emphasising the divine character of their rule in the tradition of the pharaohs. In both empires, complex interrelationships existed between the ruling dynasty and the capital's population, which were of great importance for the acceptance of the dynastic succession to the throne. Analysing Seleucid and Ptolemaic image policies can thus contribute to a better understanding of the specific challenges of Hellenistic rule.

The team of researchers will use inscriptions, coins, papyri and archaeological finds as relevant sources alongside the historiographical record. Among other things, it is planned to closely investigate recent archaeological findings from Seleucia and Alexandria. The inclusion of all available material evidence is central to balancing the predominantly Grecocentric perspective in the textual tradition. The research results will be published in a joint monograph by both project participants as well as in other publications. In addition, a six-part podcast series on the Hellenistic capitals will be produced for an interested public.

The sanctuary of Apollo at Daphne, about 4 miles west of Antioch, was an important part of the Seleucid rulers' representation. Hand coloured engraving after Abraham Ortelius, Antwerp, 1595.

Project leadership

Prof. Dr Eva Anagnostou-Laoutides
Prof. Dr Stefan Pfeiffer

Institutions

Macquaire University, Sydney
Martin-Luther-Universität, Halle-Wittenberg

Support

The Gerda Henkel Foundation supports the project by awarding two research grants and covering personnel, travel and material costs.

 

This project was documented in spring 2024.