Triumphant commander in the succession of Alexander the Great or symbol of decadent extravagance, ancient Egyptian deity or patron of the Jewish community – the kings and queens of the Hellenistic period (322–30 BC) appear in very different, even contradictory guises, depending on which source you look at. The spectrum of their self-portrayal and contemporary attributions is extremely broad. The monarchies that emerged from the legacy of Alexander's conquests demonstrated an astonishing flexibility in adapting very different customs and forms of representation for the purpose of establishing dynastic legitimacy. In doing so, the rulers of Greek-Macedonian origin responded to the very heterogeneous expectations of their subjects and the complex acculturation processes that took place between the Greek elites and the cultures of the Ancient Orient and Egypt.
But how exactly did the ruler's self-stylisation correspond to the imaginary worlds of the different groups of subjects? Despite intensive research into the Hellenistic kingdoms, little is still known about this. This is where the project of the ancient historians Prof. Dr Eva Anagnostou-Laoutides and Prof. Dr Stefan Pfeiffer comes in. By comprehensively comparing the depictions of kings from the two most important Hellenistic dynasties, the Seleucids and the Ptolemies, the international research group aims to find out how the individual ruler portrayals were created and through which cultural channels they were disseminated.